Model Comparison

Wan2.2 Animate vs VACE vs Hailuo 2.3: 6 Motion Tests

Wan2.2 Animate vs VACE vs Hailuo 2.3: 6 Motion Tests

Wan2.2 Animate vs VACE vs Hailuo 2.3: 6 motion tests

This test compares three different ways to animate a still image into a short video. Wan2.2 Animate uses a driving video for motion transfer. VACE and Hailuo 2.3 use an image-first prompt.

Models used

Test setup

  • One reference image was used for all 6 tests.
  • Wan2.2 Animate: image + driving video. Driving videos were generated with pruna/p-video using simple motion prompts.
  • VACE: image + prompt (480p, fast settings).
  • Hailuo 2.3: image-first + prompt (768P, 6 seconds).

Reference image

Reference portrait used for all motion tests
Single reference image used across all runs.

Results: 6 motion prompts

Test 1: wave

Prompt: faces the camera and waves slowly with the right hand.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Test 2: smile and nod

Prompt: looks into the camera, smiles, then nods twice.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Test 3: walk forward

Prompt: walks forward slowly toward the camera for a few steps, then stops.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Test 4: head turn left and right

Prompt: slowly turns the head to the left, then to the right, then back to center.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Test 5: two-step dance and clap

Prompt: does a simple two step dance move, side to side, then claps once.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Test 6: jump and celebrate

Prompt: jumps lightly in place once, then raises both hands in celebration.

Wan2.2 Animate VACE Hailuo 2.3

Takeaways

  • Driving-video motion transfer can preserve the starting identity, but it depends heavily on the motion source video.
  • Image-first prompting can work without a driving video, but motion intent must be described clearly.
  • Output length and resolution differ by model, so real apps should standardize settings per workflow.

Try the models


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *